Pages

Sunday, August 31, 2014

Re: The Real Climate Trends in the City of Angels - Libs Don't Want To Read The Good News.

It is. And the folks at NOAA who know more about climates than I do say that this is a product of global climate change. L


-----Original Message-----
From: 'lew' via Open Debate Political Forum IMHO <opendebateforum@googlegroups.com>
To: opendebateforum <opendebateforum@googlegroups.com>
Sent: Sun, Aug 31, 2014 10:17 am
Subject: Re: The Real Climate Trends in the City of Angels - Libs Don't Want To Read The Good News.

Gaelic?  YUP.  -  Worst drought in th history of the Earth.
 

On Sunday, August 31, 2014 11:09:32 AM UTC-4, Lynne wrote:
Gaelic?

Sent from my iPhone

On Aug 31, 2014, at 5:59 AM, "'lew' via Open Debate Political Forum IMHO" <opendeb...@googlegroups.com> wrote:

Wirt Driught iun the History ofd the Earth???
 

On Saturday, August 30, 2014 12:49:57 PM UTC-4, Lynne wrote:
I am sure those folks in California are really enjoying the worst drought ever. L

Sent from my iPhone

On Aug 30, 2014, at 5:55 AM, "'lew' via Open Debate Political Forum IMHO" <opendeb...@googlegroups.com> wrote:

The Real Climate Trends in the City of Angels  -  Libs Don't Want To Read The Good News.

 
In an interview with Dave Ross, the KIRO Radio Morning news anchor in Seattle, University of Washington Atmospheric Sciences Professor Cliff Mass was quoted with the following gem:
"If you're in Southern Canada, climate change is going to be a good thing. If you're in Siberia, it's going to be a good thing. If you're in Los Angeles and the Southwest, it's going to be a bad thing," says Mass. "I think in total, it's going to be a bad thing. Anything that changes from what we're used to is going to probably be a bad thing. But there will be winners and there will be losers."
Anything that changes from what we're used to is going to probably be a bad thing?  Absolutely anything?  There is no chance that any form of climate change anywhere at any time can be a good thing? 
   
Of course, perhaps Mass doesn't realize that this claim entirely contradicts his first two sentences, whereby he states that climate change in southern Canada and Siberia is apparently "going to be a good thing."  And since "climate change" is by definition a change "from what we're used to," it looks like we have a fundamentally incoherent suite of claims.  Climate change can be good, except when it is always bad?  An oxymoron if there ever was one.
Climate change in Los Angeles is "going to be a bad thing"? A good time to see what is actually going on with the climate in the City of Angels.
Since records began in 1878, there has been no significant trend in annual precipitation, nor in precipitation for any one of the individual months.
Over the past 30 years, the average annual temperature has a significant declining trend – aka, cooling  – as do the months of February, April, and June.  Sure, average temperatures in LA increased steadily from the 1880s up to the late 1970s, but then they started to decline sharply.  What is the anthropogenic greenhouse gas emission mechanism for that 135-year-long suite of trends?  Average temperatures in LA are now back down to the neighborhood last seen in the 1960s and 1970s.
Average maximum temperatures exhibit the same types of patterns, with significant declines on an annual basis and in April and June.  The negative correlations during July and August are also evidence that summers in LA are getting cooler in recent decades, not warmer.  Significant declining trends in February and June – and on an annual basis – for the extreme maximum temperatures, too.  In others, the climate in Los Angeles is becoming more moderate and less prone to heat waves.
More evidence of the moderation of LA's climate during the last 30 years comes from the negative correlations in both number of days above 90°F and above 95°F each year.  Same goes with the near-perfect non-correlations for number of days with heavy precipitation events (both for more than one inch, or two inches, of rain) since 1984.  No trend in number of dry days without any precipitation, either.  A moderate climate everywhere we look.
There is a significant decline in the number of cooling degree days (a measure of demand for air conditioning), and a near significant increase in the number of heating degree days (a measure of demand for having to turn your furnace on to keep the house warm).  That sounds like the exact opposite of what the warmists are predicting for LA, and it is consistent with a cooling climate.
The significant decline in growing degree days over the past 30 years in Los Angeles also means residents shouldn't be concerned about too much heat-damaging agricultural crops in the area, but instead, the recent trends suggest they should be worried about not having enough heat units over the summer to ripen the food in their backyard gardens.
Is this climate moderation and cooling what climate scientists mean when they say climate change will be a bad thing for the City of Angels?  Somehow I suspect not.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Open Debate Political Forum IMHO" group.
To post to this group, send email to OpenDeb...@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to OpenDebateFor...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/OpenDebateForum?hl=en
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Open Debate Political Forum IMHO" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to opendebatefor...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to opendeb...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/opendebateforum.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Open Debate Political Forum IMHO" group.
To post to this group, send email to OpenDeb...@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to OpenDebateFor...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/OpenDebateForum?hl=en
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Open Debate Political Forum IMHO" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to opendebatefor...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to opendeb...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/opendebateforum.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Open Debate Political Forum IMHO" group.
To post to this group, send email to OpenDebateForum@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to OpenDebateForum-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/OpenDebateForum?hl=en
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Open Debate Political Forum IMHO" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to opendebateforum+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to opendebateforum@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/opendebateforum.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Open Debate Political Forum IMHO" group.
To post to this group, send email to OpenDebateForum@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to OpenDebateForum-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/OpenDebateForum?hl=en
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Open Debate Political Forum IMHO" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to opendebateforum+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to opendebateforum@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/opendebateforum.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

RE: Why Renewable Energy Is Hopeless - The Sun Must Shine & The Wind Must Blow.

Why?Explain why Lew.
 

Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2014 08:15:03 -0700
From: opendebateforum@googlegroups.com
To: opendebateforum@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: Why Renewable Energy Is Hopeless - The Sun Must Shine & The Wind Must Blow.

We don't really need sun and wind??
 

On Sunday, August 31, 2014 11:03:21 AM UTC-4, Larry wrote:
Obviously the screed who wrote this piece of misleading feces is not an engineer of scientist. He plagiarizes right wing Tripe for the consumption of those folks who are afflicted with a "Low" intelligence quotient like Lew and his Ilk of moronic entities.
 

Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2014 03:58:06 -0700
From: opendeb...@googlegroups.com
To: opendeb...@googlegroups.com
Subject: Why Renewable Energy Is Hopeless - The Sun Must Shine & The Wind Must Blow.

Why Renewable Energy Is Hopeless - The Sun Must Shine & The Wind Must Blow.

 
At Watts Up With That?, Ed Hoskins spotlights the intractable problem with solar and wind power: much of the time, the sun isn’t shining and the wind isn’t blowing. This means that in practice, solar and wind facilities can produce only a small fraction of their nominal capacities. This chart requires a bit of study; for three countries, the U.S., Germany and the U.K., it contrasts the nominal (“nameplate”) capacity of wind and solar facilities with their actual production of energy:
clip_image0029
In each case, the actual energy produced is only a small fraction of the rated capacity. It isn’t hard to understand why this is true:
[T]here is a major problem with these renewable energy sources. Their electrical output is not dispatchable. Their output is entirely unable respond to electricity demand as and when needed. Energy is contributed to the grid in a haphazard manner dependent on the weather, and certainly not necessarily when it is required.
For example solar power inevitably varies according to the time of day, the state of the weather and also of course radically with the seasons. Essentially solar power might only work effectively in Southern latitudes and it certainly does not do well in Northern Europe. In Germany the massive commitment to solar energy might well provide up to ~20% of country wide demand for a few hours on some fine summer days either side of noon, but at the time of maximum power demand on winter evenings solar energy input is necessarily nil.
Electricity generation from wind turbines is equally fickle, as for example in a week in July this year shown above. Similarly an established high pressure zone with little wind over the whole of Northern Europe is a common occurrence in winter months, that is when electricity demand is likely to be at its highest.
Conversely on occasions renewable energy output may be in excess of demand and this has to dumped unproductively. There is still no solution to electrical energy storage on a sufficiently large industrial scale. That is the reason that the word “nominally” is used here in relation to the measured outputs from renewable energy sources.
Wind and solar power are industries that are destined to remain in their infancy, if not forever, then certainly for the indefinite future.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Open Debate Political Forum IMHO" group.
To post to this group, send email to OpenDeb...@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to OpenDebateFor...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/OpenDebateForum?hl=en
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Open Debate Political Forum IMHO" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to opendebatefor...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to opendeb...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/opendebateforum.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Open Debate Political Forum IMHO" group.
To post to this group, send email to OpenDebateForum@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to OpenDebateForum-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/OpenDebateForum?hl=en
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Open Debate Political Forum IMHO" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to opendebateforum+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to opendebateforum@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/opendebateforum.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

RE: Flashback :2008 - Sarah Palin After Obama Accepts Pres. Nom: What Exactly Is His Plan?

Talking about you,dumbass.............
 

Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2014 08:18:55 -0700
From: opendebateforum@googlegroups.com
To: opendebateforum@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: Flashback :2008 - Sarah Palin After Obama Accepts Pres. Nom: What Exactly Is His Plan?

It took a while for Liberals to learn - But now -  Obama is getting his earned respect.
 

On Sunday, August 31, 2014 11:09:50 AM UTC-4, Larry wrote:
Respect is earned Lew, hence you get the respect that you have earned.
 

Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2014 04:00:22 -0700
From: opendeb...@googlegroups.com
To: opendeb...@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: Flashback :2008 - Sarah Palin After Obama Accepts Pres. Nom: What Exactly Is His Plan?

Middle East Terrrorits were around long before G.W. Bush.
 

On Saturday, August 30, 2014 12:47:33 PM UTC-4, Lynne wrote:
So caution is bad? We got into this mess when W had a plan but the plan was based on lies . I think bombing runs are fine fir now and I think Obama is working with other countries to insure that any boots on the ground are not American but those if a true coalition. L

Sent from my iPhone

On Aug 30, 2014, at 9:15 AM, "'lew' via Open Debate Political Forum IMHO" <opendeb...@googlegroups.com> wrote:

Thyanks four showing your usual respect.
 
A typical Liberal.
 

On Friday, August 29, 2014 7:29:25 AM UTC-4, Larry wrote:
Curious Picture if Palin. Is this the motion that she made when she was asked how long Glenn Rice's Penis was when she had her affair with him years ago?

 

Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2014 03:49:04 -0700
From: opendeb...@googlegroups.com
To: opendeb...@googlegroups.com
Subject: Flashback :2008 - Sarah Palin After Obama Accepts Pres. Nom: What Exactly Is His Plan?

Flashback :2008 - Sarah Palin After Obama Accepts Pres. Nom: What Exactly Is His Plan?

by 28 Aug 2014 1122 p
 
Six years to the day after he accepted the Democratic presidential nomination in 2008, President Barack Obama announced that he did not have a strategy to combat ISIS, which recently beheaded American photojournalist James Foley.
“I don't want to put the cart before the horse,” Obama said of ISIS at a Thursday press conference. “We don't have a strategy yet.”
After Obama accepted the nomination in front of Greek columns on August 28, 2008, Republican vice presidential nominee Sarah Palin asked, “But when the cloud of rhetoric has passed, when the roar of the crowd fades away, when the stadium lights go out and those Styrofoam Greek columns are hauled back to some studio lot, when that happens, what exactly is our opponent’s plan?” 
Palin also predicted in 2008 that Russia could invade Ukraine if Obama became president. She was mocked for these prophetic remarks:
After the Russian Army invaded the nation of Georgia, Senator Obama's reaction was one of indecision and moral equivalence, the kind of response that would only encourage Russia's Putin to invade Ukraine next.
Six years after all of the soaring rhetoric and mainstream media tingles, Obama's "strong disapproval" rating doubles his "strong approval" rating, according to Gallup.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Open Debate Political Forum IMHO" group.
To post to this group, send email to OpenDeb...@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to OpenDebateFor...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/OpenDebateForum?hl=en
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Open Debate Political Forum IMHO" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to opendebatefor...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to opendeb...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/opendebateforum.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Open Debate Political Forum IMHO" group.
To post to this group, send email to OpenDeb...@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to OpenDebateFor...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/OpenDebateForum?hl=en
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Open Debate Political Forum IMHO" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to opendebatefor...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to opendeb...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/opendebateforum.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Open Debate Political Forum IMHO" group.
To post to this group, send email to OpenDeb...@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to OpenDebateFor...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/OpenDebateForum?hl=en
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Open Debate Political Forum IMHO" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to opendebatefor...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to opendeb...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/opendebateforum.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Open Debate Political Forum IMHO" group.
To post to this group, send email to OpenDebateForum@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to OpenDebateForum-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/OpenDebateForum?hl=en
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Open Debate Political Forum IMHO" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to opendebateforum+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to opendebateforum@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/opendebateforum.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: Flashback :2008 - Sarah Palin After Obama Accepts Pres. Nom: What Exactly Is His Plan?

It took a while for Liberals to learn - But now -  Obama is getting his earned respect.
 

On Sunday, August 31, 2014 11:09:50 AM UTC-4, Larry wrote:
Respect is earned Lew, hence you get the respect that you have earned.
 

Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2014 04:00:22 -0700
From: opendeb...@googlegroups.com
To: opendeb...@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: Flashback :2008 - Sarah Palin After Obama Accepts Pres. Nom: What Exactly Is His Plan?

Middle East Terrrorits were around long before G.W. Bush.
 

On Saturday, August 30, 2014 12:47:33 PM UTC-4, Lynne wrote:
So caution is bad? We got into this mess when W had a plan but the plan was based on lies . I think bombing runs are fine fir now and I think Obama is working with other countries to insure that any boots on the ground are not American but those if a true coalition. L

Sent from my iPhone

On Aug 30, 2014, at 9:15 AM, "'lew' via Open Debate Political Forum IMHO" <opendeb...@googlegroups.com> wrote:

Thyanks four showing your usual respect.
 
A typical Liberal.
 

On Friday, August 29, 2014 7:29:25 AM UTC-4, Larry wrote:
Curious Picture if Palin. Is this the motion that she made when she was asked how long Glenn Rice's Penis was when she had her affair with him years ago?

 

Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2014 03:49:04 -0700
From: opendeb...@googlegroups.com
To: opendeb...@googlegroups.com
Subject: Flashback :2008 - Sarah Palin After Obama Accepts Pres. Nom: What Exactly Is His Plan?

Flashback :2008 - Sarah Palin After Obama Accepts Pres. Nom: What Exactly Is His Plan?

by 28 Aug 2014 1122 p
 
Six years to the day after he accepted the Democratic presidential nomination in 2008, President Barack Obama announced that he did not have a strategy to combat ISIS, which recently beheaded American photojournalist James Foley.
"I don't want to put the cart before the horse," Obama said of ISIS at a Thursday press conference. "We don't have a strategy yet."
After Obama accepted the nomination in front of Greek columns on August 28, 2008, Republican vice presidential nominee Sarah Palin asked, "But when the cloud of rhetoric has passed, when the roar of the crowd fades away, when the stadium lights go out and those Styrofoam Greek columns are hauled back to some studio lot, when that happens, what exactly is our opponent's plan?" 
Palin also predicted in 2008 that Russia could invade Ukraine if Obama became president. She was mocked for these prophetic remarks:
After the Russian Army invaded the nation of Georgia, Senator Obama's reaction was one of indecision and moral equivalence, the kind of response that would only encourage Russia's Putin to invade Ukraine next.
Six years after all of the soaring rhetoric and mainstream media tingles, Obama's "strong disapproval" rating doubles his "strong approval" rating, according to Gallup.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Open Debate Political Forum IMHO" group.
To post to this group, send email to OpenDeb...@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to OpenDebateFor...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/OpenDebateForum?hl=en
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Open Debate Political Forum IMHO" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to opendebatefor...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to opendeb...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/opendebateforum.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Open Debate Political Forum IMHO" group.
To post to this group, send email to OpenDeb...@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to OpenDebateFor...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/OpenDebateForum?hl=en
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Open Debate Political Forum IMHO" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to opendebatefor...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to opendeb...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/opendebateforum.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Open Debate Political Forum IMHO" group.
To post to this group, send email to OpenDeb...@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to OpenDebateFor...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/OpenDebateForum?hl=en
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Open Debate Political Forum IMHO" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to opendebatefor...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to opendeb...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/opendebateforum.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Open Debate Political Forum IMHO" group.
To post to this group, send email to OpenDebateForum@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to OpenDebateForum-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/OpenDebateForum?hl=en
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Open Debate Political Forum IMHO" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to opendebateforum+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to opendebateforum@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/opendebateforum.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: The Real Climate Trends in the City of Angels - Libs Don't Want To Read The Good News.

Gaelic?  YUP.  -  Worst drought in th history of the Earth.
 

On Sunday, August 31, 2014 11:09:32 AM UTC-4, Lynne wrote:
Gaelic?

Sent from my iPhone

On Aug 31, 2014, at 5:59 AM, "'lew' via Open Debate Political Forum IMHO" <opendeb...@googlegroups.com> wrote:

Wirt Driught iun the History ofd the Earth???
 

On Saturday, August 30, 2014 12:49:57 PM UTC-4, Lynne wrote:
I am sure those folks in California are really enjoying the worst drought ever. L

Sent from my iPhone

On Aug 30, 2014, at 5:55 AM, "'lew' via Open Debate Political Forum IMHO" <opendeb...@googlegroups.com> wrote:

The Real Climate Trends in the City of Angels  -  Libs Don't Want To Read The Good News.

 
In an interview with Dave Ross, the KIRO Radio Morning news anchor in Seattle, University of Washington Atmospheric Sciences Professor Cliff Mass was quoted with the following gem:

"If you're in Southern Canada, climate change is going to be a good thing. If you're in Siberia, it's going to be a good thing. If you're in Los Angeles and the Southwest, it's going to be a bad thing," says Mass. "I think in total, it's going to be a bad thing. Anything that changes from what we're used to is going to probably be a bad thing. But there will be winners and there will be losers."

Anything that changes from what we're used to is going to probably be a bad thing?  Absolutely anything?  There is no chance that any form of climate change anywhere at any time can be a good thing? 
   
Of course, perhaps Mass doesn't realize that this claim entirely contradicts his first two sentences, whereby he states that climate change in southern Canada and Siberia is apparently "going to be a good thing."  And since "climate change" is by definition a change "from what we're used to," it looks like we have a fundamentally incoherent suite of claims.  Climate change can be good, except when it is always bad?  An oxymoron if there ever was one.

Climate change in Los Angeles is "going to be a bad thing"? A good time to see what is actually going on with the climate in the City of Angels.

Since records began in 1878, there has been no significant trend in annual precipitation, nor in precipitation for any one of the individual months.

Over the past 30 years, the average annual temperature has a significant declining trend – aka, cooling  – as do the months of February, April, and June.  Sure, average temperatures in LA increased steadily from the 1880s up to the late 1970s, but then they started to decline sharply.  What is the anthropogenic greenhouse gas emission mechanism for that 135-year-long suite of trends?  Average temperatures in LA are now back down to the neighborhood last seen in the 1960s and 1970s.

Average maximum temperatures exhibit the same types of patterns, with significant declines on an annual basis and in April and June.  The negative correlations during July and August are also evidence that summers in LA are getting cooler in recent decades, not warmer.  Significant declining trends in February and June – and on an annual basis – for the extreme maximum temperatures, too.  In others, the climate in Los Angeles is becoming more moderate and less prone to heat waves.

More evidence of the moderation of LA's climate during the last 30 years comes from the negative correlations in both number of days above 90°F and above 95°F each year.  Same goes with the near-perfect non-correlations for number of days with heavy precipitation events (both for more than one inch, or two inches, of rain) since 1984.  No trend in number of dry days without any precipitation, either.  A moderate climate everywhere we look.

There is a significant decline in the number of cooling degree days (a measure of demand for air conditioning), and a near significant increase in the number of heating degree days (a measure of demand for having to turn your furnace on to keep the house warm).  That sounds like the exact opposite of what the warmists are predicting for LA, and it is consistent with a cooling climate.

The significant decline in growing degree days over the past 30 years in Los Angeles also means residents shouldn't be concerned about too much heat-damaging agricultural crops in the area, but instead, the recent trends suggest they should be worried about not having enough heat units over the summer to ripen the food in their backyard gardens.

Is this climate moderation and cooling what climate scientists mean when they say climate change will be a bad thing for the City of Angels?  Somehow I suspect not.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Open Debate Political Forum IMHO" group.
To post to this group, send email to OpenDeb...@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to OpenDebateFor...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/OpenDebateForum?hl=en
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Open Debate Political Forum IMHO" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to opendebatefor...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to opendeb...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/opendebateforum.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Open Debate Political Forum IMHO" group.
To post to this group, send email to OpenDeb...@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to OpenDebateFor...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/OpenDebateForum?hl=en
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Open Debate Political Forum IMHO" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to opendebatefor...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to opendeb...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/opendebateforum.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Open Debate Political Forum IMHO" group.
To post to this group, send email to OpenDebateForum@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to OpenDebateForum-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/OpenDebateForum?hl=en
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Open Debate Political Forum IMHO" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to opendebateforum+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to opendebateforum@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/opendebateforum.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: Why Renewable Energy Is Hopeless - The Sun Must Shine & The Wind Must Blow.

We don't really need sun and wind??
 

On Sunday, August 31, 2014 11:03:21 AM UTC-4, Larry wrote:
Obviously the screed who wrote this piece of misleading feces is not an engineer of scientist. He plagiarizes right wing Tripe for the consumption of those folks who are afflicted with a "Low" intelligence quotient like Lew and his Ilk of moronic entities.
 

Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2014 03:58:06 -0700
From: opendeb...@googlegroups.com
To: opendeb...@googlegroups.com
Subject: Why Renewable Energy Is Hopeless - The Sun Must Shine & The Wind Must Blow.

Why Renewable Energy Is Hopeless - The Sun Must Shine & The Wind Must Blow.

 
At Watts Up With That?, Ed Hoskins spotlights the intractable problem with solar and wind power: much of the time, the sun isn't shining and the wind isn't blowing. This means that in practice, solar and wind facilities can produce only a small fraction of their nominal capacities. This chart requires a bit of study; for three countries, the U.S., Germany and the U.K., it contrasts the nominal ("nameplate") capacity of wind and solar facilities with their actual production of energy:
clip_image0029
In each case, the actual energy produced is only a small fraction of the rated capacity. It isn't hard to understand why this is true:
[T]here is a major problem with these renewable energy sources. Their electrical output is not dispatchable. Their output is entirely unable respond to electricity demand as and when needed. Energy is contributed to the grid in a haphazard manner dependent on the weather, and certainly not necessarily when it is required.
For example solar power inevitably varies according to the time of day, the state of the weather and also of course radically with the seasons. Essentially solar power might only work effectively in Southern latitudes and it certainly does not do well in Northern Europe. In Germany the massive commitment to solar energy might well provide up to ~20% of country wide demand for a few hours on some fine summer days either side of noon, but at the time of maximum power demand on winter evenings solar energy input is necessarily nil.
Electricity generation from wind turbines is equally fickle, as for example in a week in July this year shown above. Similarly an established high pressure zone with little wind over the whole of Northern Europe is a common occurrence in winter months, that is when electricity demand is likely to be at its highest.
Conversely on occasions renewable energy output may be in excess of demand and this has to dumped unproductively. There is still no solution to electrical energy storage on a sufficiently large industrial scale. That is the reason that the word "nominally" is used here in relation to the measured outputs from renewable energy sources.
Wind and solar power are industries that are destined to remain in their infancy, if not forever, then certainly for the indefinite future.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Open Debate Political Forum IMHO" group.
To post to this group, send email to OpenDeb...@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to OpenDebateFor...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/OpenDebateForum?hl=en
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Open Debate Political Forum IMHO" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to opendebatefor...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to opendeb...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/opendebateforum.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Open Debate Political Forum IMHO" group.
To post to this group, send email to OpenDebateForum@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to OpenDebateForum-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/OpenDebateForum?hl=en
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Open Debate Political Forum IMHO" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to opendebateforum+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to opendebateforum@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/opendebateforum.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

RE: Flashback :2008 - Sarah Palin After Obama Accepts Pres. Nom: What Exactly Is His Plan?

Respect is earned Lew, hence you get the respect that you have earned.
 

Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2014 04:00:22 -0700
From: opendebateforum@googlegroups.com
To: opendebateforum@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: Flashback :2008 - Sarah Palin After Obama Accepts Pres. Nom: What Exactly Is His Plan?

Middle East Terrrorits were around long before G.W. Bush.
 

On Saturday, August 30, 2014 12:47:33 PM UTC-4, Lynne wrote:
So caution is bad? We got into this mess when W had a plan but the plan was based on lies . I think bombing runs are fine fir now and I think Obama is working with other countries to insure that any boots on the ground are not American but those if a true coalition. L

Sent from my iPhone

On Aug 30, 2014, at 9:15 AM, "'lew' via Open Debate Political Forum IMHO" <opendeb...@googlegroups.com> wrote:

Thyanks four showing your usual respect.
 
A typical Liberal.
 

On Friday, August 29, 2014 7:29:25 AM UTC-4, Larry wrote:
Curious Picture if Palin. Is this the motion that she made when she was asked how long Glenn Rice's Penis was when she had her affair with him years ago?

 

Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2014 03:49:04 -0700
From: opendeb...@googlegroups.com
To: opendeb...@googlegroups.com
Subject: Flashback :2008 - Sarah Palin After Obama Accepts Pres. Nom: What Exactly Is His Plan?

Flashback :2008 - Sarah Palin After Obama Accepts Pres. Nom: What Exactly Is His Plan?

by 28 Aug 2014 1122 p
 
Six years to the day after he accepted the Democratic presidential nomination in 2008, President Barack Obama announced that he did not have a strategy to combat ISIS, which recently beheaded American photojournalist James Foley.
“I don't want to put the cart before the horse,” Obama said of ISIS at a Thursday press conference. “We don't have a strategy yet.”
After Obama accepted the nomination in front of Greek columns on August 28, 2008, Republican vice presidential nominee Sarah Palin asked, “But when the cloud of rhetoric has passed, when the roar of the crowd fades away, when the stadium lights go out and those Styrofoam Greek columns are hauled back to some studio lot, when that happens, what exactly is our opponent’s plan?” 
Palin also predicted in 2008 that Russia could invade Ukraine if Obama became president. She was mocked for these prophetic remarks:
After the Russian Army invaded the nation of Georgia, Senator Obama's reaction was one of indecision and moral equivalence, the kind of response that would only encourage Russia's Putin to invade Ukraine next.
Six years after all of the soaring rhetoric and mainstream media tingles, Obama's "strong disapproval" rating doubles his "strong approval" rating, according to Gallup.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Open Debate Political Forum IMHO" group.
To post to this group, send email to OpenDeb...@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to OpenDebateFor...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/OpenDebateForum?hl=en
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Open Debate Political Forum IMHO" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to opendebatefor...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to opendeb...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/opendebateforum.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Open Debate Political Forum IMHO" group.
To post to this group, send email to OpenDeb...@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to OpenDebateFor...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/OpenDebateForum?hl=en
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Open Debate Political Forum IMHO" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to opendebatefor...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to opendeb...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/opendebateforum.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Open Debate Political Forum IMHO" group.
To post to this group, send email to OpenDebateForum@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to OpenDebateForum-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/OpenDebateForum?hl=en
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Open Debate Political Forum IMHO" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to opendebateforum+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to opendebateforum@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/opendebateforum.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: The Real Climate Trends in the City of Angels - Libs Don't Want To Read The Good News.

Gaelic?

Sent from my iPhone

On Aug 31, 2014, at 5:59 AM, "'lew' via Open Debate Political Forum IMHO" <opendebateforum@googlegroups.com> wrote:

Wirt Driught iun the History ofd the Earth???
 

On Saturday, August 30, 2014 12:49:57 PM UTC-4, Lynne wrote:
I am sure those folks in California are really enjoying the worst drought ever. L

Sent from my iPhone

On Aug 30, 2014, at 5:55 AM, "'lew' via Open Debate Political Forum IMHO" <opendeb...@googlegroups.com> wrote:

The Real Climate Trends in the City of Angels  -  Libs Don't Want To Read The Good News.

 
In an interview with Dave Ross, the KIRO Radio Morning news anchor in Seattle, University of Washington Atmospheric Sciences Professor Cliff Mass was quoted with the following gem:

"If you're in Southern Canada, climate change is going to be a good thing. If you're in Siberia, it's going to be a good thing. If you're in Los Angeles and the Southwest, it's going to be a bad thing," says Mass. "I think in total, it's going to be a bad thing. Anything that changes from what we're used to is going to probably be a bad thing. But there will be winners and there will be losers."

Anything that changes from what we're used to is going to probably be a bad thing?  Absolutely anything?  There is no chance that any form of climate change anywhere at any time can be a good thing? 
   
Of course, perhaps Mass doesn't realize that this claim entirely contradicts his first two sentences, whereby he states that climate change in southern Canada and Siberia is apparently "going to be a good thing."  And since "climate change" is by definition a change "from what we're used to," it looks like we have a fundamentally incoherent suite of claims.  Climate change can be good, except when it is always bad?  An oxymoron if there ever was one.

Climate change in Los Angeles is "going to be a bad thing"? A good time to see what is actually going on with the climate in the City of Angels.

Since records began in 1878, there has been no significant trend in annual precipitation, nor in precipitation for any one of the individual months.

Over the past 30 years, the average annual temperature has a significant declining trend – aka, cooling  – as do the months of February, April, and June.  Sure, average temperatures in LA increased steadily from the 1880s up to the late 1970s, but then they started to decline sharply.  What is the anthropogenic greenhouse gas emission mechanism for that 135-year-long suite of trends?  Average temperatures in LA are now back down to the neighborhood last seen in the 1960s and 1970s.

Average maximum temperatures exhibit the same types of patterns, with significant declines on an annual basis and in April and June.  The negative correlations during July and August are also evidence that summers in LA are getting cooler in recent decades, not warmer.  Significant declining trends in February and June – and on an annual basis – for the extreme maximum temperatures, too.  In others, the climate in Los Angeles is becoming more moderate and less prone to heat waves.

More evidence of the moderation of LA's climate during the last 30 years comes from the negative correlations in both number of days above 90°F and above 95°F each year.  Same goes with the near-perfect non-correlations for number of days with heavy precipitation events (both for more than one inch, or two inches, of rain) since 1984.  No trend in number of dry days without any precipitation, either.  A moderate climate everywhere we look.

There is a significant decline in the number of cooling degree days (a measure of demand for air conditioning), and a near significant increase in the number of heating degree days (a measure of demand for having to turn your furnace on to keep the house warm).  That sounds like the exact opposite of what the warmists are predicting for LA, and it is consistent with a cooling climate.

The significant decline in growing degree days over the past 30 years in Los Angeles also means residents shouldn't be concerned about too much heat-damaging agricultural crops in the area, but instead, the recent trends suggest they should be worried about not having enough heat units over the summer to ripen the food in their backyard gardens.

Is this climate moderation and cooling what climate scientists mean when they say climate change will be a bad thing for the City of Angels?  Somehow I suspect not.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Open Debate Political Forum IMHO" group.
To post to this group, send email to OpenDeb...@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to OpenDebateFor...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/OpenDebateForum?hl=en
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Open Debate Political Forum IMHO" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to opendebatefor...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to opendeb...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/opendebateforum.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Open Debate Political Forum IMHO" group.
To post to this group, send email to OpenDebateForum@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to OpenDebateForum-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/OpenDebateForum?hl=en
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Open Debate Political Forum IMHO" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to opendebateforum+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to opendebateforum@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/opendebateforum.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.